Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper ViprTech Overlord 2.0 Liquid-Cooled on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ViprTech Overlord 2.0 Liquid-Cooled is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 69% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ViprTech Overlord 2.0 Liquid-Cooled - 222 vs 131 FPS
Advantages of ViprTech Overlord 2.0 Liquid-Cooled PC
- Up to 74% cheaper than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $1424.99 vs $5499.99
- Up to 56% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $10.88 vs $24.77 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
222
100%
Value, $/FPS
$24.77/FPS
43.924101735970936%
Price, $
$5499.99
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $5,499.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 432730 minutes ago
FPS
131
59.009009009009006%
Value, $/FPS
$10.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1424.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,424.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 432728 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
35.71589627959414%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
35.30232558139535%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC | vs | ViprTech Overlord 2.0 Liquid-Cooled PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
