Key Differences
In short — ASUS ROG GT15CF outperforms the cheaper Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i350 R4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i350 R4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ASUS ROG GT15CF Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 153% better in Alan Wake 2 than Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i350 R4 - 76 vs 30 FPS
Advantages of Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i350 R4 Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 64% cheaper than ASUS ROG GT15CF - $749.99 vs $2088.0
- Up to 9% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than ASUS ROG GT15CF - $25.0 vs $27.47 per FPS
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
20th Variation
FPS
76
100%
Value, $/FPS
$27.47/FPS
91.00837277029487%
Price, $
$2088
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for $2,088 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 445197 minutes ago
Apr 17th, 2023
FPS
30
39.473684210526315%
Value, $/FPS
$25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$749.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $749.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 445197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
20th Variation
Apr 17th, 2023
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
20th Variation
GeForce RTX 3080
10 GB GDDR6X | 320-bit
Pixel Fillrate
164.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
465.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Apr 17th, 2023
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
34.628501827040196%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
30.574070092453233%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
20th Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2362
100%
Multi-Core
11527
100%
CPU Winner
Apr 17th, 2023
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
92.76037256562235%
Multi-Core
8910
77.29678146959313%
ASUS ROG GT15CF Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i350 R4 Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Apr 17th, 2023 |
| Core i7-12700F | CPU | Core i5-12400F |
| GeForce RTX 3080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD + 1 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
