Key Differences
In short — AVGPC Blizzard outperforms the cheaper Centaurus Andromeda A1 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Centaurus Andromeda A1 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of AVGPC Blizzard Gaming Computer PC
- Performs up to 70% better in Ready or Not than Centaurus Andromeda A1 - 178 vs 105 FPS
Advantages of Centaurus Andromeda A1 Gaming Computer PC
- Up to 41% cheaper than AVGPC Blizzard - $997.0 vs $1699.0
- Up to 0% better value when playing Ready or Not than AVGPC Blizzard - $9.5 vs $9.54 per FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
2nd Variation
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.54/FPS
99.58071278825996%
Price, $
$1699
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 445484 minutes ago
FPS
105
58.98876404494382%
Value, $/FPS
$9.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$997
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $997 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 445489 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3080
10 GB GDDR6X | 320-bit
Pixel Fillrate
164.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
465.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
34.628501827040196%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
30.574070092453233%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i9-11900K
3.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2371
100%
Multi-Core
10948
100%
CPU Winner
AVGPC Blizzard Gaming Computer PC | vs | Centaurus Andromeda A1 Gaming Computer PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-11900K | CPU | Ryzen 7 5800X |
GeForce RTX 3080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD |