Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation outperforms the cheaper BEASTCOM Q5 Pro, on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing BEASTCOM Q5 Pro, is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of BEASTCOM Q5 Pro Gaming, Gaming PC
- Up to 82% cheaper than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $969.0 vs $5399.99
- Up to 14% better value when playing World of Tanks than Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation - $7.81 vs $9.12 per FPS
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 377% better in World of Tanks than BEASTCOM Q5 Pro, - 592 vs 124 FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
124
20.945945945945947%
Value, $/FPS
$7.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$969
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $969 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 445869 minutes ago
FPS
592
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.12/FPS
85.6359649122807%
Price, $
$5399.99
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $5,399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 445868 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
12.820744081172492%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
11.023255813953488%
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
BEASTCOM Q5 Pro Gaming, Gaming PC | vs | Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-10400F | CPU | Core i9-13900K |
| GeForce RTX 3050 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 6 TB HDD |
