Key Differences
In short — Centaurus Andromeda 2 outperforms the cheaper MSI Aegis ZS on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MSI Aegis ZS is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Centaurus Andromeda 2 Gaming Computer PC
- Performs up to 24% better in Starfield than MSI Aegis ZS - 46 vs 37 FPS
Advantages of MSI Aegis ZS Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 25% cheaper than Centaurus Andromeda 2 - $1249.0 vs $1659.0
- Up to 6% better value when playing Starfield than Centaurus Andromeda 2 - $33.76 vs $36.07 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
46
100%
Value, $/FPS
$36.07/FPS
93%
Price, $
$1659
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,659 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 364485 minutes ago
Aug 2nd, 2023
FPS
37
80%
Value, $/FPS
$33.76/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1249
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 364485 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Radeon RX 7800 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
233.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
583.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Aug 2nd, 2023
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
50%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
40%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Aug 2nd, 2023
Ryzen 7 7700
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2854
100%
Multi-Core
14808
100%
CPU Winner
Centaurus Andromeda 2 Gaming Computer PC | vs | MSI Aegis ZS Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Aug 2nd, 2023 |
| Ryzen 9 5900X | CPU | Ryzen 7 7700 |
| Radeon RX 7800 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
