Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Centaurus Pollux 2 outperforms the more expensive Dell XPS 8960 Tower on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Centaurus Pollux 2 Gaming Computer PC
- Performs up to 26% better in No Man's Sky than Dell XPS 8960 Tower - 137 vs 109 FPS
- Up to 38% cheaper than Dell XPS 8960 Tower - $1191.0 vs $1930.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Dell XPS 8960 Tower - $8.69 vs $17.71 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1191
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,191 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 445144 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
109
79.56204379562044%
Value, $/FPS
$17.71/FPS
49.06832298136645%
Price, $
$1930
61%
Buy for $1,930 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 445144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Radeon RX 7600
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
169.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
339.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
33.46674514420247%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
41.84814596821659%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i9-13900K
3.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2974
100%
Multi-Core
20148
100%
CPU Winner
Centaurus Pollux 2 Gaming Computer PC | vs | Dell XPS 8960 Tower Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 7600 | CPU | Core i9-13900K |
| Radeon RX 7600 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
