Key Differences
In short — Thermaltake LCGS Glacier i3510 CPU outperforms the cheaper Acer Nitro 50 N50-600-UR1H on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Acer Nitro 50 N50-600-UR1H is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Thermaltake LCGS Glacier i3510 CPU is 788 days newer than the cheaper Acer Nitro 50 N50-600-UR1H.
Advantages of Thermaltake LCGS Glacier i3510 CPU Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 27% better in Ready or Not than Acer Nitro 50 N50-600-UR1H - 85 vs 67 FPS
Advantages of Acer Nitro 50 N50-600-UR1H Desktop PC
- Up to 22% cheaper than Thermaltake LCGS Glacier i3510 CPU - $699.0 vs $899.99
- Up to 2% better value when playing Ready or Not than Thermaltake LCGS Glacier i3510 CPU - $10.43 vs $10.59 per FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FPS
85
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.59/FPS
98.48914069877243%
Price, $
$899.99
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 444073 minutes ago
Feb 3rd, 2020
FPS
67
78.82352941176471%
Value, $/FPS
$10.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$699
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 444069 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Feb 3rd, 2020
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Feb 3rd, 2020
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
93.70383397819205%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
65.56962025316456%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Feb 3rd, 2020
Core i5-9400F
2.9 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1378
95.82753824756607%
Multi-Core
4834
84.05494696574509%
Thermaltake LCGS Glacier i3510 CPU Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Acer Nitro 50 N50-600-UR1H Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
Apr 1st, 2022 | Release Date | Feb 3rd, 2020 |
| Core i5-10400F | CPU | Core i5-9400F |
| GeForce RTX 3050 | GPU | GeForce GTX 1650 |
16 GB | RAM | 8 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
