Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-6100 outperforms the more expensive Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1101 days older than the more expensive Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-6100 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 5% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Athlon 200GE - 103 vs 98 FPS
- Up to 33% cheaper than Athlon 200GE - $100.0 vs $149.0
- Up to 36% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Athlon 200GE - $0.97 vs $1.52 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
98
95.14563106796116%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
63.815789473684205%
Price, $
$149
67%
Buy for $149 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359807 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
103
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359809 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Single-Core
889
74.45561139028476%
Multi-Core
1857
79.49486301369863%
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i3 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |