Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms the cheaper Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 200GE is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 417 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-9900KS - $149.0 vs $535.0
- Up to 60% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-9900KS - $0.51 vs $1.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 35 vs 127 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 41% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Athlon 200GE - 416 vs 294 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 16 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
294
70.67307692307693%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$149
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $149 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361317 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
FPS
416
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.29/FPS
39.53488372093023%
Price, $
$535
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for $535 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361318 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KS |
---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2019 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i9 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 127 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |