Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 162 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - $63.83 vs $205.5
- Up to 66% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700KF - $0.36 vs $1.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Athlon 3000G - 193 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
178
92.2279792746114%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348668 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
33.9622641509434%
Price, $
$205.5
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for $205.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348668 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
56.294117647058826%
Multi-Core
1975
24.43399727823828%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |