Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms EPYC 7443P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 660 days newer than EPYC 7443P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7443P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-13900F - 48 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 15% better in Alan Wake 2 than EPYC 7443P - 134 vs 117 FPS
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
EPYC 7443P
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7443P | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
| Milan | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 24 | Cores | 24 |
48 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 200 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.5x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
