Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2015 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-13900F - 64 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 16% better in God of War than EPYC 7551P - 195 vs 168 FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
| Naples | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 24 |
64 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
