Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms EPYC 75F3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 946 days newer than EPYC 75F3.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 75F3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-14900KF - 64 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 15% better in Sea of Thieves than EPYC 75F3 - 287 vs 249 FPS
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Single-Core
1826
58.75160875160875%
Multi-Core
16432
78.09143617526851%
AMD EPYC 75F3 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 24 |
64 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
280 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |