Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms EPYC 7713 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 1029 days newer than EPYC 7713.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7713
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-14900 - 128 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 17% better in Sea of Thieves than EPYC 7713 - 282 vs 242 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7713 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
EPYC 7713
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Core i9-14900
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7713
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Single-Core
1617
54.88798370672098%
Multi-Core
15315
96.54542016012103%
AMD EPYC 7713 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
| Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 24 |
128 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 225 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
