Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 1615 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 8700G - 128 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 44% better in Starfield than EPYC 7742 - 79 vs 55 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 65 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Ryzen 7 8700G
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1204
44.82501861504095%
Multi-Core
11782
82.76782578152441%
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 8700G |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Rome | Codename | Not Available |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 8 |
128 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 225 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 7 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 22.5x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
