Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8845HS is 1582 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS - 128 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
- Performs up to 38% better in Starfield than EPYC 7742 - 76 vs 55 FPS
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 45 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Rome | Codename | Not Available |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
64 | Cores | 8 |
128 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 45 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
No | Overclockable | No |