Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7945HX outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7945HX is 1246 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX - 128 vs 32 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
- Performs up to 45% better in Dirt 5 than EPYC 7742 - 249 vs 172 FPS
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 55 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1204
44.08641523251556%
Multi-Core
11782
74.82535247046869%
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Rome | Codename | Dragon Range |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
64 | Cores | 16 |
128 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
No | Overclockable | Yes |