Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 881 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900F - 128 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 38% better in Dirt 5 than EPYC 7742 - 238 vs 172 FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i9-12900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1204
47.420244190626235%
Multi-Core
11782
84.82361411087112%
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
| Rome | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 16 |
128 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 225 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 22.5x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
