Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms EPYC 9654 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 341 days newer than EPYC 9654.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 9654
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-14900KF - 192 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 60% better in Immortals of Aveum than EPYC 9654 - 107 vs 67 FPS
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 9654
Server/Workstation • Nov 10th, 2022
Core i9-14900KF
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 9654
Server/Workstation • Nov 10th, 2022
Single-Core
1870
60.16731016731016%
Multi-Core
19264
91.55023286759814%
AMD EPYC 9654 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
| Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket SP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
96 | Cores | 24 |
192 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
| 360 W | TDP | Not Available |
5 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
