Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 4471 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 54% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-6100 - 163 vs 106 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 32 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i9-14900
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| FX | Collection | Core i9 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 6 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
