Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 6900HX outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 6900HX is 3375 days newer than FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
- Performs up to 21% better in Ready or Not than FX-6300 - 282 vs 234 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
234
82.97872340425532%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$128.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $128.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360494 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Mobile • Jan 19th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Rembrandt |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket FP7 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 45 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 6 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 680M |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |