Key Differences
In short — FX-8120 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G630 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G630 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-8120 is 38 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G630.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Performs up to 1% better in Far Cry 6 than Pentium G630 - 90 vs 89 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G630 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G630
- Up to 52% cheaper than FX-8120 - $37.49 vs $78.02
- Up to 52% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than FX-8120 - $0.42 vs $0.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
90
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
48.275862068965516%
Price, $
$78.02
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360511 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
89
98.88888888888889%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$37.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $37.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360511 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Single-Core
393
92.25352112676056%
Multi-Core
683
43.558673469387756%
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Pentium G630 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Pentium |
Zambezi | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |