Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10850K outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2603 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 15% better in No Man's Sky than FX-9590 - 182 vs 158 FPS
- Up to 4% cheaper than FX-9590 - $286.0 vs $298.02
- Up to 17% better value when playing No Man's Sky than FX-9590 - $1.57 vs $1.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 125 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
158
86.81318681318682%
Value, $/FPS
$1.89/FPS
83.06878306878308%
Price, $
$298.02
95%
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353897 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$286
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $286 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353898 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |