Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 5242 days newer than Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 18% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Phenom II X4 830 - 346 vs 294 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 32 vs 4 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Phenom II X4 830
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Core i9-14900F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom II X4 830
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Single-Core
303
10.033112582781458%
Multi-Core
926
5.068418171866448%
AMD Phenom II X4 830 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Deneb | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
