Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 5396 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 29% better in Overwatch 2 than Phenom X4 9650 - 402 vs 311 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 32 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Agena | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 11.5x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
