Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 1200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 530 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 3 1200.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 9% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen 3 1200 - 181 vs 166 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1200 - $359.0 vs $395.0
- Up to 17% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen 3 1200 - $1.98 vs $2.38 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 16 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
166
91.71270718232044%
Value, $/FPS
$2.38/FPS
83.19327731092437%
Price, $
$395
90%
Buy for $395 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354057 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$359
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $359 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354056 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Single-Core
984
58.190419869899465%
Multi-Core
2834
35.19185396746554%
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |