Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms Ryzen 3 3200U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 1185 days newer than Ryzen 3 3200U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 15 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 124% better in FIFA 23 than Ryzen 3 3200U - 260 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200U - 24 vs 4 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 3200U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Core i9-12900KS
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Picasso | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
