Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Ryzen 3 3200U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1459 days newer than Ryzen 3 3200U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 9% better in Metro Exodus than Ryzen 3 3200U - 153 vs 141 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200U - 32 vs 4 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen 3 3200U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 3200U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Single-Core
775
28.388278388278387%
Multi-Core
1489
8.647424356815145%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 15 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
