Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 6 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10600K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 1% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-10600K - 112 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Up to 4% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - $143.72 vs $150.0
- Up to 4% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 3300X - $1.29 vs $1.34 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280314 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
111
99%
Value, $/FPS
$1.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$143.72
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $143.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280314 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |