Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 1741 days newer than Ryzen 3 PRO 1300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 22% better in Sea of Thieves than Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 - 275 vs 225 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 - 24 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Desktop • Jun 29th, 2017
Core i9-12900KS
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Desktop • Jun 29th, 2017
Single-Core
1066
39.59881129271917%
Multi-Core
2951
18.19022375639524%
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
