Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Ryzen 5 2500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 2265 days newer than Ryzen 5 2500U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 110% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 5 2500U - 593 vs 283 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500U - 32 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen 5 2500U
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2017
Core i9-14900F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 2500U
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2017
Single-Core
814
26.953642384105958%
Multi-Core
2330
12.753147235905857%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 15 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
