Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

3.4 GHz | 6-core

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Logo
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler - YD2600BBAFBOX

Buy for $155 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 349958 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

3.0 GHz | 24-core

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX Logo
AMD YD297XAZAFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 24 Core, 48 Thread Processor, Pack of 1

Buy for $1,150 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 349958 minutes ago

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

3.4 GHz | 6-core

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Logo
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler - YD2600BBAFBOX

Buy for $155 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 349958 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

3.0 GHz | 24-core

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX Logo
AMD YD297XAZAFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 24 Core, 48 Thread Processor, Pack of 1

Buy for $1,150 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 349958 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 166 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600

  • Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $155.0 vs $1150.0
  • Up to 86% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $2.87 vs $20.54 per FPS
  • Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 65 vs 250 Watts

Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

  • Performs up to 4% better in Starfield than Ryzen 5 2600 - 56 vs 54 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 48 vs 12 threads
This is a free version of Starfield.

Starfield

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Logo
Ryzen 5 2600

Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018


FPS

54

96.42857142857143%

Value, $/FPS

$2.87/FPS

100%

Price, $

$155

100%

Value Winner

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler - YD2600BBAFBOX

Buy for $155 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 349958 minutes ago

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX Logo
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018


FPS

56

100%

Value, $/FPS

$20.54/FPS

13.97273612463486%

Price, $

$1150

13%

FPS Winner

AMD YD297XAZAFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 24 Core, 48 Thread Processor, Pack of 1

Buy for $1,150 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 349958 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Logo
Ryzen 5 2600

Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX Logo
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Logo
Ryzen 5 2600

Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018


Single-Core

1152

93.27935222672065%

Multi-Core

4841

65.35709464020522%

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX Logo
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018


Single-Core

1235

100%

Multi-Core

7407

100%

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 2600

vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX Logo

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

Apr 19th, 2018Release Date
Oct 2nd, 2018
Ryzen 5CollectionRyzen Threadripper
Pinnacle RidgeCodenameColfax
AMD Socket AM4SocketAMD Socket SP3r2
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
6Cores
24
12Threads
48
3.4 GHz
Base Clock Speed3.0 GHz
3.9 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
4.2 GHz
65 W
TDP250 W
12 nmProcess Size12 nm
34.0x
Multiplier30.0x
NoneIntegrated GraphicsNone
YesOverclockableYes

Builds Using Ryzen 5 2600 or Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

Starfield, 1920 x 1080, Ultra

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.