Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - $155.0 vs $205.5
- Up to 17% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-10700KF - $1.52 vs $1.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 10% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 5 2600 - 112 vs 102 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 16 vs 12 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
102
91.07142857142857%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$155
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $155 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349880 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
112
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.83/FPS
83.06010928961747%
Price, $
$205.5
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for $205.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349879 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1152
67.76470588235294%
Multi-Core
4841
59.891129531114686%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |