Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 369 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $155.0 vs $389.88
- Up to 58% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-9700F - $1.21 vs $2.91 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 5% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen 5 2600 - 134 vs 128 FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
128
95.52238805970148%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$155
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $155 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349867 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.91/FPS
41.5807560137457%
Price, $
$389.88
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for $389.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349867 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1152
74.37056165267914%
Multi-Core
4841
77.38171355498721%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |