Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $155.0 vs $299.98
- Up to 45% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i9-10900 - $0.54 vs $0.99 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 4% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Ryzen 5 2600 - 302 vs 289 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
289
95.69536423841059%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$155
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $155 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349880 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
302
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
54.545454545454554%
Price, $
$299.98
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for $299.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349880 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1152
67.6056338028169%
Multi-Core
4841
57.48723429521434%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |