Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 548 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - $155.0 vs $615.0
- Up to 74% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-10900X - $0.95 vs $3.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 4% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 5 2600 - 170 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 20 vs 12 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
163
95.88235294117648%
Value, $/FPS
$0.95/FPS
100%
Price, $
$155
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $155 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349954 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
170
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.62/FPS
26.243093922651934%
Price, $
$615
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $615 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349953 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1152
73.09644670050761%
Multi-Core
4841
51.659374666524386%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |