Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 297 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i9-7900X - $155.0 vs $400.0
- Up to 60% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-7900X - $1.21 vs $3.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 3% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen 5 2600 - 132 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 20 vs 12 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
128
96.96969696969697%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$155
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $155 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349883 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
132
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.03/FPS
39.93399339933993%
Price, $
$400
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for $400 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349883 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1152
81.0126582278481%
Multi-Core
4841
55.13039517139278%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |