Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1132 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $132.0 vs $145.0
- Up to 7% better value when playing God of War than Core i7-6900K - $0.78 vs $0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 1% better in God of War than Ryzen 5 3400G - 172 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 16 vs 8 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
170
98.83720930232558%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$132
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $132 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353899 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
172
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
92.85714285714286%
Price, $
$145
91%
FPS Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353899 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1128
90.09584664536742%
Multi-Core
3619
50.84293340826075%
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |