Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 298 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-10100 - 208 vs 205 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Up to 11% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - $99.03 vs $110.99
- Up to 9% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 5 3600 - $0.39 vs $0.43 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
208
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
90.69767441860466%
Price, $
$110.99
89%
FPS Winner
Buy for $110.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353701 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
205
98.5576923076923%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353702 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1426
89.29242329367564%
Multi-Core
4215
61.22893666472981%
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |