Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Ryzen 5 4600G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 905 days newer than Ryzen 5 4600G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 11% better in World of Tanks than Ryzen 5 4600G - 597 vs 539 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 4600G - 32 vs 12 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 4600G
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 4600G
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Single-Core
1574
50.69243156199678%
Multi-Core
6127
28.063023862959742%
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 21st, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 150 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
