Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1457 days newer than Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 19% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U - 190 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U - 32 vs 8 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 15 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
