Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 1622 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $185.0 vs $297.99
- Up to 9% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-13600K - $3.43 vs $3.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 46% better in Starfield than Ryzen 7 2700 - 79 vs 54 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
54
68.35443037974683%
Value, $/FPS
$3.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$185
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350012 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
79
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.77/FPS
90.98143236074272%
Price, $
$297.99
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for $297.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350011 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1114
41.80112570356473%
Multi-Core
5489
36.967941810344826%
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 14 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |