Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 1062 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - $185.0 vs $240.0
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 35% better in Starfield than Ryzen 7 2700 - 73 vs 54 FPS
- Up to 4% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 7 2700 - $3.29 vs $3.43 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
54
73.97260273972603%
Value, $/FPS
$3.43/FPS
95.91836734693877%
Price, $
$185
100%
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350013 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
73
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$240
77%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350012 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1114
48.079413034095815%
Multi-Core
5489
54.212345679012344%
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |