Buy on Amazon
$406.45
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $399
Availability
MSRP in USD: $399
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 68 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 2% better in Dirt 5 than Core i9-10900F - 198 vs 194 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 40% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3800XT - $244.77 vs $406.45
- Up to 39% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Ryzen 7 3800XT - $1.26 vs $2.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen 7 3800XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.05/FPS
61.46341463414635%
Price, $
$406.45
60%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT 8-core, 16-Threads Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for $406.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350213 minutes ago
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
194
97.97979797979798%
Value, $/FPS
$1.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$244.77
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen 7 3800XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1676
95.33560864618885%
Multi-Core
8426
99.3514915693904%
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 16 | Threads | 20 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 105 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
