Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 310 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 3% better in World of Tanks than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 543 vs 529 FPS
- Up to 59% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $445.0 vs $1075.0
- Up to 60% better value when playing World of Tanks than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $0.82 vs $2.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 105 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 32 vs 24 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
543
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$445
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $445 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361443 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
529
97.42173112338858%
Value, $/FPS
$2.03/FPS
40.39408866995074%
Price, $
$1075
41%
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361443 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Single-Core
1263
74.60129946839929%
Multi-Core
8338
83.90018112296237%
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Matisse | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |