Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms Ryzen 9 4900HS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 668 days newer than Ryzen 9 4900HS.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 11% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 9 4900HS - 186 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS - 24 vs 16 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
Single-Core
1450
57.10909807010635%
Multi-Core
6387
45.98272138228941%
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Renoir | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |