Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms Ryzen 9 6900HX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 15 days older than Ryzen 9 6900HX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 9% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 9 6900HX - 128 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX - 24 vs 16 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 9 6900HX
Mobile • Jan 19th, 2022
Core i9-12900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 6900HX
Mobile • Jan 19th, 2022
Single-Core
1979
77.94407246947617%
Multi-Core
9532
68.62491000719942%
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
|---|---|---|
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Rembrandt | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket FP7 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 16 |
| 16 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | Not Available |
6 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Radeon 680M | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
