Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 1352 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 22% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-9700F - 133 vs 109 FPS
- Up to 15% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-9700F - $3.05 vs $3.58 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Up to 4% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - $389.88 vs $406.02
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
133
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.05/FPS
100%
Price, $
$406.02
96%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $406.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280170 minutes ago
Buy for $389.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raphael | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
44.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |