Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms Celeron 1037U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 3922 days newer than Celeron 1037U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1037U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 59% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron 1037U - 167 vs 105 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1037U - 32 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron 1037U
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Core i9-14900KF
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1037U | vs | Intel Core i9-14900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
| 17 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
