Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 3235 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 18% better in Fortnite than Celeron 3205U - 248 vs 210 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 32 vs 2 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Core i9-14900F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Single-Core
280
9.271523178807946%
Multi-Core
486
2.6600985221674875%
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 15 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
